scientific committee promoting sound science

Is REACH a pointless animal massacre?

The EU chemicals testing program REACH is a well-intentioned but scientifically flawed attempt to protect human health and the environment, both of which continue to be at risk from the effects of toxic chemicals.

The EU chemicals testing program REACH (registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals) is a well-intentioned but scientifically flawed attempt to protect human health and the environment from the effects of toxic chemicals. This is the conclusion reached in a report published this week in the peer-reviewed journalMedicolegal and Bioethics .

The report suggests that:

  • EU health authorities are out of step with modern toxicology
  • Current animal test requirements are invalid for predicting human response
  • REACH will result in a pointless animal massacre
  • Public health and the environment will continue to be at risk from the effects of toxic chemicals.

Principal author of the report Andre Menache states:

“Although REACH does put the burden of proof on manufacturers to demonstrate the safety of their products, it then “scores an own goal” by obliging manufacturers to conform to invalid test methods to predict human health outcomes.”

He adds: “The fact that EU citizens have not been given the opportunity to grant or deny their consent before being exposed to the toxic burden that now contaminates us all has legal as well as public health implications. The presence of nearly 300 industrial chemicals in umbilical cord blood of newborn babies is testimony to a failed strategy of pollution control, when EU health authorities should be focusing their efforts on pollution prevention.”

The report calls for the following measures to be implemented without delay:

  • Significantly increase the biomonitoring of EU citizens and make the results publicly available
  • Toxic risk assessment of chemicals based on modern toxicology, not animal tests; and to be conducted in an independent and transparent manner
  • Prioritisation for a ban and avoidance of harmful chemicals found in adult and umbilical cord blood and urine samples
  • Public policy based on pollution prevention, rather than pollution control.


André Ménache
Mob: (0790) 644-6889

Press releases

New study reveals adverse effects when common pesticides mixed

7 August 2012: An Antidote Europe-funded study demonstrates the harmful effects of mixtures of the pesticides pyrimethanil, cyprodinil and fludioxonil. A scientific study conducted by Aston University in Britain and funded by NGOs Future Generations and Antidote Europe has been published in the peer-reviewed

Why the Nuremberg Code may harm your health

11 July 2012: Science has moved forward 65 years since the end of World War II but the laws have not yet caught up with the science. A doctor, lawyer and university professor of neuroscience have just released startling new evidence to show

Claude Reiss on Radio France Inter

9 July 2012: Claude Reiss, Antidote Europe’s president, will be interviewed tomorrow, July 10th, at 14:00 on Radio France Inter about chemicals in our environment. The interview will be held in French.

Faulty breast implants

10 January 2012: In a letter addressed to the chief executive of the MHRA, the consumer watchdog Antidote Europe today accused the MHRA of failing in its mission to protect the public. The PIP breast implant health scare is a shocking example of regulatory failure on the part
Read more ›

Scientists question value of monkey experiments

7 December 2011: An article published in the peer-reviewed Medicolegal and Bioethics presents a rare challenge not just on the ethics but also on the science of using non-human primates in research. Public surveys have consistently shown the general public to be uneasy about the
Read more ›





  • 12/10 - BBC presenter Uhlenbroek joins scientists on campaign
  • 06/07 - Making a molehill out of the Bisphenol A mountain
  • 10/02 - Another warning about bisphenol A


  • 26/11 - Antidote Europe receives achievement award
  • 05/08 - Is Bisphenol A the new silent killer?
  • 08/07 - Bisphenol A, a chemical time bomb?
  • 30/03 - EU directive lags woefully behind the science


  • 25/08 - EU continues to allow bisphenol in baby dummies
  • 17/06 - EU cautioned not to use animal organs
  • 19/05 - Authorities warned of Bisphenol A health risk
  • 11/04 - GM: let true science prevail!
  • 12/02 - EC meets worried scientists
  • 05/02 - Justice for our health


  • 09/10 - New initiative aimed at improved risk assessment
  • 30/08 - Will the USA be first to stop testing chemicals on animals?
  • 25/06 - Antidote Europe’s expert contribution recognised
  • 04/06 - REACH: Obsolete from birth
  • 18/04 - French presidential candidates inarticulate on preventive health measures
  • 02/04 - Forgotten in the campaign: Our health
  • 01/03 - Belgian Senate attentive to scientific toxicology
  • 12/02 - Obsolete toxicology and human health in peril


  • 25/04 - Europeans demand a reliable assessment of chemical’s toxicity