Contact : 25 rue Jacques Callot - 66000 Perpignan - France
Tel : 33 (0)4 68 80 53 32
Lundi et jeudi de 10h30 à 18h / Monday and Thursday from 10h30 to 18h
Press release - April 18th, 2007
The candidates are not very eloquent on the subject of preventive health measures
With only a few days left before the first round of the presidential election, the candidates seem to be showing little concern for a question that is nevertheless fundamental, i.e. health. Some are preoccupied with the reimbursement of health care, others repeat that "our health system is one of the best-performing in the world", but then how do they explain the fact that there are more and more sick people? Real and effective prevention would at one and the same time allow the social security's books to be balanced and ensure the well-being of all.
Antidote Europe recently
sent a questionnaire to the twelve candidates; this questionnaire was
circulated in an earlier press release and published in Le Monde
of 13th April 2007. After a brief statement of the facts, figures and
arguments, three measures were called for:
The LCR, the party presenting Mr. Olivier Besancenot, replied, favourably and point by point, recognising that "toxicogenomics effectively seems reliable (cf. work by Narbonne and others) and often preferable to animal experimentation", that "transferring animal results to human beings is risky" and that "protection of the new-born means banning pesticides in general and in food in particular. The protection of babies and children is worthy of a safety label for non-toxic products, including volatile ones."*
The PS, the party presenting Mrs. Ségolène Royal, replied that "the care system should be transformed into a health system" and that "the health-environment line should be developed", and thought "the idea of a recognised safety label for pregnant women is excellent". Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy did not answer the questionnaire point by point but considered that "health and environment should be better reconciled". Both Mrs. Royal* and Mr. Sarkozy* propose increasing the budgets for prevention and research but the documents sent to Antidote Europe set out no really new approaches. But Antidote Europe considers it more necessary to learn from research failures and reassign credits to really effective methods than to increase these credits. Health care and prevention might also usefully be the subject of a critical examination of the methods implemented which seem to do little to improve the health situation in our country.
The FN acknowledged receipt of the questionnaire but to date Antidote Europe has not received a reply. The Greens also acknowledged receipt of the questionnaire and referred to their internet site without giving a specific answer to these questions.
Antidote Europe is doing its duty as an independent scientific committee by alerting the authorities and, more particularly, the person who will be presiding over France for the next five years. As effective means are available to the future President, what will he or she do to reduce the 300,000 new cases of cancer diagnosed each year, the hundreds of thousands of cases of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease and allergies, etc., and to avoid these diseases emerging among younger and younger people?
Antidote Europe is a non-profit-making association created by researchers from the CNRS and working for better prevention in the field of human health.
* Letter available on the Antidote Europe site, in French only.